Watching the Inside Edition piece, we see the same old stuff, and the same old empty arguments. A main one is the stuff about promising a "modeling career."

Hello? Models who make money have a career. What Inside Edition attempts to imply is that nasty webmasters are telling 5'2" C-cup 13-yo girls that they'll have a career like a 5'10" runway model such as Tyra Banks. Never happen. And where's the proof that any webmasters are making such promises? None is offered.

Most teen wannabe models pay photographers to take pictures of them. Those who aren't obvious no-hopers may be able to get TFP work, Time For Print. This means that photogs will take pictures and not charge them, but also will not pay them. Only a small number of teen models on OMP, for example, are actually paid for their time. By contrast, presumably 100% of paysite models make money. So enough of this old warhorse.

Other techniques used, such as showing Jimmy's mug shot (?), were intended to imply that Jimmy really was guilty, despite being found innocent of all charges. Throwing Sierra's mom into the mix was intended to show guilt-by-associatio n, i.e., both are/were in the same line of business, therefore both are guilty.

Then there's the "skirting the law" argument. Which is to say, that keeping within the law is "skirting the law." This is a context-specific argument which is often used for sexy material. It refers to people pushing the boundaries, typically on issues relating to sexual morality. This is not really the same thing as Jimmy's Ferrari example, because it relates to culture, tradition and morality in ways that maintaining the speed limit do not. However, in the end, the law is the law, and abiding by the law is not "skirting" it, it is obeying the law. The law doesn't change simply because a lot of people don't like it.

Those of us familiar with the photos shown will know that, in many cases, fogged areas did not need to be fogged. The fogging implied that something naughty was being hidden, for example Tina's HB shot, where fogging causes the viewer to imagine that nipples are being shown, which is false. Naturally, this will cause knee-jerk reactions in many viewers, while many others will be curious to see what was fogged.

On the positive side, Elle Coley was brilliant, handily demolishing the notion that she's an exploited model or that the mere thought of older guys drooling over her should be in some way traumatic or creepy

The sad thing about this entire situation is the media. They need something shocking to gain ratings and it is the MEDIA who exploits things such as this. How old was Brooke Shields when she modeled completely naked for the first time? 8? 9? Elle McPherson, Christie Brinkley, Nicki Taylor? Guess what.. this is part of the modeling business. Notice how the video does not mention other modeling jobs that these girls do for companies in which they are modeling sports attire, jeans, prom dresses, etc... Now don't get me wrong, of course there are some people out there such as that Sheila mother who are not professional and their children are not models and yes that is completely wrong, but as for the models of True Teen Babes, look at the photos, these are all professional models and there is absolutely nothing wrong with these photos. For the media to attempt to make it seem like it is *sexually explicit* is ridiculous and it is the media adding light like that to what a model does that put these models in danger, all for the viewers and to twist the truths and get the viewers outraged about something that simply does not exist. Yet as long as the viewers want to believe the lies in videos such as these (and from the comments below, I can see many did without investigating it on their own) the media will continue to fabricate stories for ratings. How many models have been stalked because of media personas such as this? If you want risque, look at Maxim, Victoria's Secret, Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition... and no, none of the above is wrong or *disgusting* either. They are legitimate jobs for professional models, exactly the same as TTB. Haven't we had enough media misrepresentation yet people?

What the hell?! They send you to prison only for WHAT PICTURES YOU POST ON A WEBSITE??? Did the world really go completely mad? The internet is not a damn way to arrest people for all the smallest nothings! What country is that? The law there should be more dangerous then being a hostage in Iraq! Honestly! The world has gone mad!

get the fuck away from thier lives!

If a 13 year old girl want's to be a model, let her be a model. ASk yourself what's best. A 40 year old man, sitting at home at his computer, masurbating to pictures of underage girls OR a 40 year old man out there sexually harassing small children?

My first reaction when I saw this video was that I had never heard of these sites UNTIL this video. Inside Edition essentially took a site that most of us knew nothing about and made it front page news, doing their OWN part to exploit the immenently HOT Elle just to score ratings.

My second reaction is that Elle seems more together and more mature, as well as comfortable with herself, than most adults I know. That attorney is just jealous because she is fat and over the hill. I would be the farm that the attorney would have LOVED to be seen as sexy as Elle is. Instead she is hiding behind this crusade of hers to shot down sites that for all intents and purposes are entirely legal.

Third, the suggestion that older men (whatever older is) who view someone as beautiful as Elle are perverts is simply ludicrous. Elle is gorgeous. Period. And I do not recall all the hooplah when Brittany Smears topped the charts with HER boobs! No difference as far as I am concerned.

Another thought that I had is that Elle is full of it. She is smart enough to know exactly what she is selling, and she might as well be consistent and say, "Hell yes I am selling sex. So what. It's my body. Don't you find me sexy, Mr. Inside Edition Interviewer? It sure seems like you do, judging by the buldge in your pants." I would have more respect for the girl if she was just honest. Don't give me this innocent "Oh, I don't think I am selling sex" crap.

And the guy that got arrested? Trying to convict him by associating him with that mother is just a slight of hand. Just a cheap trick. The guy was found innocent. So there was no need to even show his face. What the mother did was wrong. It was just wrong. Not the same thing at all.

Now, before all you self-righteous feminists get on your high horse, I am not condoning sex with kids. Nor am I condining sexuall exploiting them. But Elle seems like she is pretty together for the most part. She is no desert flower. And I would bet she has been around the block once or twice, sadly.

I agree the line has to be drawn somewhere. I am just not sure where it needs to be drawn. In the 1800's people were marrying and having kids when they were 15 and 16. In the 1600's sometimes sooner than that.

The bottom line is we have a big problem in this country. Teens are getting sexier and wilder every day. Female teachers are hitting on male students and getting slaps on the wrist, while men are treated like dogs and thrown into the penitentiary for doing the same thing. There is a double standard and that is wrong.

I think the laws need to be re-examined and then once that is done, applied evenly across board. But cultural change is happening and we need to address it.

everyone is entitled to their own thoughts, we all would look at this and think differently. sum would find this absolutly gross and others find it "beautiful". the way we think varies.
about whether they r selling sex or not, its all about the posture rite? posing with legs wide open is not sexually inviting??? tru naked pictures can be considered art and beautiful IF the posture is not suggestive! but then again, thats jus my pt of view.
i must say that mother is completely sick, wat ppl do to mak money! that grl has a corrupted life ahead of her...and then again, this world is so vast, anything is possible and things like this is probably quite common throughout.
this video, i agree is too dramatic though still disturbing even without the narrator. these grls hav underdeveloped bodies! but it IS their choice, these models are not forced to do this (hopefully) so like everyone else they r entitled to their own decisions. u heard the grl, naive as she is she's not finding slobbering oldies creepy.
i'm 16 turnin 17, and i CHOOSE not to ever do this kind of stuff becos i find it wrong. but these grls chose to model...so let them. they'll learn eventually =S *maybe*
things like this happen everyday, its wat makes us the WORLD, its wat makes us human: we're complex beings, we do...weird things. we'll never hav a "perfect" kinda place without all this crap

that fat old lady kept making my boner go limp

Inside Edition is hypocritical. It's not a public service show. It's trashy entertainment. You can bet that in the promos for this show they heavily advertised the same material that was being trashed. The show didn't take on this topic to be helpful or altruistic. They did it because they knew the subject matter would tittilate and give them big ratings.

what a tease. I want to go to these sites and look at these hot girls. And NO it's not disturbing. They may be underage legally, but not biologically.
why is it that fat ugly women are always the ones that complain about women being exploited? haha.

It's really silly how this has become the fixation in media over the last couple of years. Everyone likes to think they know what's best for other people. Don't get me wrong, I think that what that mom was doing to make money off of her 10 yo daughter is dispicable, but how is that much different from parents who exploit their children in "beauty pagents" It's not really. It's just one is dressed to look like a cheap whore and the other is undressed to look like a cheap whore. It really is in the eyes of the beholder. I really didn't find much wrong with those photoshoots in that video. If the girls have no problems with the photos and the photographers aren't trying to hit onthe girls what's the big deal? Is it pornographic for JCPenney's to have photos of young girls in swimsuits to sell their clothing to that same age group? No. It's the context you as the viewer see it in. It seems to me that most of these things are about the people that are pointing the finger having naughty thoughts about these pics. They feel that if they have the naughty thoughts then so must other people.
Is it wrong for a mom to take baby pics of her kid in the tub? It sure wasn't when I was a kid. And y pics were never used for anything except to embarrass me in front of girlfriends in my teen years... ugh. lol
People need to accept that not everyone sees these kinds of pics as sexually arousing.

man that website rulez it make me horny for a whole day dude you guys should go to the website

If they can bleed they can breed.

You look and you keep looking. Their ratings skyrocket. If ya don't like what you're seeing...CLOSE YOUR EYES AND COVER YOUR FACE AND SCREAM "OHHHHH MY VIRGIN EYES!!"

Funny how they blur the panties XD

i agree that this is alil twisted but... if i was younger HeLL yea i would bash it.but im older and i dont want to go to jail,plus she wanted to do and they are not doing anything sexual,so really come on.

why get these lil girl pics on net. if they after sex y dont they go on chat sites and get wat they after.

lol what is so funny about this is that they are complaining about people going on there and veiwing them, but what did they just do? they just did the same thing didn't they?

these freaking nosy reporter trying to make everything a huge story ..... playing those stupid voices .

If you want my personal opinion, I do not like where adult entertainment is going! The current trend now is younger girls, not women between 30

when 14 yo's have sex and drink at parties, why teach them morals when they want to model...teach em to stop having sex with their bf's then

Was anybody else annoyed by the overly dramatic voice of the narrator? It sounded like a bad tabloid journalist from the 20's... - Quedas "O Bravo"

Watch Sexy Videos
Watch full sexy videos no passes or registration require
click on following link
www.sexyvideos.net.tc

This isn't right I mean this is wrong.

PLEASE DONT READ THIS!!!!U WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF UR LIFE. 2MORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF UR LIFE.HOWEVER IF U DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO ATLEAST 3 VIDEOS U WILL DIE IN 2 DAYS.NOW UV STARTED READIN THIS SO DONT STOP NOW!THIS IS SOOO SCARY.SEND THIS TO ATLEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSSHES NAMEWILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS THIS IS SOO SCARY CUZ IT ACTUALLY WORKS!!!!!

I dont see anything wrong with underagers modelling. But if they are actually exposed nude like in this vid, then WTF. Isnt that against the law?!

MOOOAAAARRR

Its not just cause they want to be models they actually like wearing these clothes for attention not realizing the proper intentions and the sickness of most of these guys who look at them! My daughter is nearly 4 and I wish I could ban any girl under 16 wearing less than me, still working on a way 2 educate her about people like this without spoiling her innocence any advice would be appreciated cause much worse happens behind closed doors and unlike my Mam I dont have eyes in the back of my head J

Just gross

Show a young girl doing sexy poses and go to jail for eleven years.
Show criminals, terrorists, soldiers or cowboys killing other people and be honored.

nice way of thinkin!!!

Starting a modeling career? More like a pornography career.

I think you are all nuts. The human body is a most lovely sight in any form be it young, old, rotund or that which incites wanton desires,.so what. The only ones out there that should be going to jail and prison are the ones that prey on children that want nothing to do with them or that would otherwise not have had anything to do with them. Do I advocate child sex? NO Absolutely not but I can't see Prison for the willing nature of the mutual beast. (touch my mother daughter sister or any that is not willing and Ill be the first to kill as death is the only worth for predators0

Get ringtones at RINGTONESET dot NET

It's good to see educational items on here instead of just funny videos etc

I am shocked at this stuff. You can google sheila sellinger and there is a host of VERY provocative poses of a 10 year old. Give me a freaking break. 10 year olds should be playing outside with dolls and gi joes not being subjected to this filth.
There is a special ring in hell for child exploiters.

B

Are you Dah!??! These girls are very hot! Nothing wrong here...

Gots to get me some of these underage girls....Whoo woo.

...Naw im just kidding, dont trip...cuz under 13 is wrong, lol.

it's legal at 16 in the UK and europe.

This girls are so hot and young!!! really freash!! wana fuck them all!!

"wow this is so disgusting.....

the URL is www...." are you trying to stop it or promote it?

really 20 year olders are better looking than these boobless teens. i myself beig 17 prefer women in their 18-25. really thats... just disturbing. our world is a mess. no wonder some of these girls end up doing drugs. $75 and HOUR!!! 80 i'd have a new car by now. all these months of working from $5/h to my recent salary of $20/h. ARRGGGHHH UNFAIR.
im not mad im jealous.

I wish they showed their cooters i bet they're really tight

If they got nothing to show they should'nt show...

know what I meen?

NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE


NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE ASS NICE ASS

When she was near seventeen, she did a complete nude scenes, even her breast looked way underdeveloped.
But the law is the law, here in US, if they sign the authorize or even is shot overseas, they get away.

U know they're always talking about child porn and all that trying to stop it and trying to stop ppl from seeing then why are they showing those pics and those websites on tv where every pervert can see it. They're making it worse. Why r u gonna show sites with underage naked girls in it when your supposedly trying to stop perverts. I don't understand that.

jessica honey come here for a sec....haha jk jk

Theyre just posing. theres no sexual activity and they are not showing any sensitive imagery. I dont see why pictures are bad. its when you sleep with them , thats when its questionable. But if i knew a 16yrold boy was sleeping with a 15yr old girl.. that wouldnt bother me at all.

lol at the end of the day i wouldnt touch the girls ( im 20 )

aslong as fantasy doesnt become reality, then society is safe.

hiding some of the comments .. sometimes it says 72 comments and then it turns to 56...:S

Which Im guessing is the point behing all of this.. Who is anyone to rule against nature? Who took this right away from us making that desicion on our behalf?

the girl who wear an blue tits hel she suck my dick her name is barada khater from majdal shams.

any1 have a site with naked teens that shows 4 free? email me
imsohappy12 345678910@ hotmail.com

It should be noted that the people who got all upset and responded on MetaCafe displayed very little command of the English language

well i was little 14 i had sex almost every week, it was cool then but looking back at it... not so much, and ive come to the one word conclusion... why?

i want to know that blondes name...please tell me !!!! please

who wants to see my 8.5 incher for 75$/hr. =P ha